Search by Algolia
How personalization boosts customer engagement
e-commerce

How personalization boosts customer engagement

You land on your favorite retailer’s website, where everything seems to be attractively arranged just for you. Your favorite ...

Jon Silvers

Director, Digital Marketing

What is retail analytics and how can it inform your data-driven ecommerce merchandising strategy?
e-commerce

What is retail analytics and how can it inform your data-driven ecommerce merchandising strategy?

There is such tremendous activity both on and off of retailer websites today that it would be impossible to make ...

Catherine Dee

Search and Discovery writer

8 ways to use merchandising data to boost your online store ROI
e-commerce

8 ways to use merchandising data to boost your online store ROI

New year, new goals. Sounds positive, but looking at your sales data, your revenue and profit aren’t so hot ...

John Stewart

VP, Corporate Communications and Brand

Algolia DocSearch + Astro Starlight
engineering

Algolia DocSearch + Astro Starlight

What is Astro Starlight? If you're building a documentation site, your content needs to be easy to write and ...

Jaden Baptista

Technical Writer

What role does AI play in recommendation systems and engines?
ai

What role does AI play in recommendation systems and engines?

You put that in your cart. How about this cool thing to go with it? You liked that? Here are ...

Catherine Dee

Search and Discovery writer

How AI can help improve your user experience
ux

How AI can help improve your user experience

They say you get one chance to make a great first impression. With visual design on ecommerce web pages, this ...

Jon Silvers

Director, Digital Marketing

Keeping your Algolia search index up to date
product

Keeping your Algolia search index up to date

When creating your initial Algolia index, you may seed the index with an initial set of data. This is convenient ...

Jaden Baptista

Technical Writer

Merchandising in the AI era
e-commerce

Merchandising in the AI era

For merchandisers, every website visit is an opportunity to promote products to potential buyers. In the era of AI, incorporating ...

Tariq Khan

Director of Content Marketing

Debunking the most common AI myths
ai

Debunking the most common AI myths

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CAN’T BE TRUSTED, shouts the headline on your social media newsfeed. Is that really true, or is ...

Vincent Caruana

Senior Digital Marketing Manager, SEO

How AI can benefit the retail industry
ai

How AI can benefit the retail industry

Artificial intelligence is on a roll. It’s strengthening healthcare diagnostics, taking on office grunt work, helping banks combat fraud ...

Catherine Dee

Search and Discovery writer

How ecommerce AI is reshaping business
e-commerce

How ecommerce AI is reshaping business

Like other modern phenomena such as social media, artificial intelligence has landed on the ecommerce industry scene with a giant ...

Vincent Caruana

Senior Digital Marketing Manager, SEO

AI-driven smart merchandising: what it is and why your ecommerce store needs it
ai

AI-driven smart merchandising: what it is and why your ecommerce store needs it

Do you dream of having your own personal online shopper? Someone familiar and fun who pops up every time you ...

Catherine Dee

Search and Discovery writer

NRF 2024: A cocktail of inspiration and innovation
e-commerce

NRF 2024: A cocktail of inspiration and innovation

Retail’s big show, NRF 2024, once again brought together a wide spectrum of practitioners focused on innovation and transformation ...

Reshma Iyer

Director of Product Marketing, Ecommerce

How AI-powered personalization is transforming the user and customer experience
ai

How AI-powered personalization is transforming the user and customer experience

In a world of so many overwhelming choices for consumers, how can you best engage with the shoppers who visit ...

Vincent Caruana

Senior Digital Marketing Manager, SEO

Unveiling the future: Algolia’s AI revolution at NRF Retail Big Show
algolia

Unveiling the future: Algolia’s AI revolution at NRF Retail Big Show

Get ready for an exhilarating journey into the future of retail as Algolia takes center stage at the NRF Retail ...

John Stewart

VP Corporate Marketing

How to master personalization with AI
ai

How to master personalization with AI

Picture ecommerce in its early days: businesses were just beginning to discover the power of personalized marketing. They’d divide ...

Ciprian Borodescu

AI Product Manager | On a mission to help people succeed through the use of AI

5 best practices for nailing the ecommerce virtual assistant user experience
ai

5 best practices for nailing the ecommerce virtual assistant user experience

“Hello there, how can I help you today?”, asks the virtual shopping assistant in the lower right-hand corner ...

Vincent Caruana

Senior Digital Marketing Manager, SEO

Add InstantSearch and Autocomplete to your search experience in just 5 minutes
product

Add InstantSearch and Autocomplete to your search experience in just 5 minutes

A good starting point for building a comprehensive search experience is a straightforward app template. When crafting your application’s ...

Imogen Lovera

Senior Product Manager

Looking for something?

facebookfacebooklinkedinlinkedintwittertwittermailmail

The Washington Post publishes around 1,200 stories, graphics, and videos per day. You read that correctly: one thousand two hundred pieces of content every single day. That’s nearly half a million pieces of content per year. It’s a prolific output, but nothing unusual. The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times each produce around 240 articles and blog posts a day. BuzzFeed, a company known for its high output, publishes 220 listicles, blogs, articles, and videos a day.

The point is: newspapers produce a prodigious amount of material. It’s not just newspapers, either. Most media companies — whether they’re in broadcasting, news, publications, audio, or streaming — produce and manage enormous content libraries. Their archives often live on a home-built content management system (CMS) — and there are good reasons for this.

Media companies have very particular needs: specific content catalogs, unique editorial workflows, and particular publication strategies. There are few (if any) off-the-shelf solutions that are powerful and flexible enough to fit every need. So companies build, rather than buy. For the purpose of production and publication, their home-built CMSs do work. But they inadvertently lock content away in inaccessible archives.

The native search within home-built platforms is consistently poor. Relevance is sub-par, the user interface is crowded, and the advanced features are lacking — if present at all. Often, the search function will run on simple keyword matching, which is fine for small search indices but not a good fit for colossal media libraries.

Consider a journalist writing a weekly update on low-carbon technologies in their country. If they search their CMS for low-carbon, a basic keyword search will return hundreds or thousands of results. A quick experiment reveals more than 32,000 results on The Guardian. Such a heavy-handed approach surfaces far too many results to sift through manually. Unless the journalist in question hits the jackpot, they aren’t going to stumble on what they’re looking for by chance. But outmoded search technology isn’t the only challenge. Data consistency burdens internal search, too.

Few media companies produce all their content internally. Newspapers publish wire stories from external journalists. Magazines run syndicated stories from partner publications. Television networks buy shows from a myriad of production companies. Music streaming services amalgamate back catalogs from hundreds of independent labels. Without fail, each source will have a different metadata structure. And there’s no guarantee that the creator (journalist, filmmaker, editor) will have stuck to their in-house structure, either. Inconsistent metadata means there’s no guarantee that you’re searching your entire content library.

Both challenges (search technology and metadata consistency) render internal search unreliable, even misleading and false, for many media companies. But why does that matter? 

Time, productivity, and impact

Think back to that journalist reporting on low-carbon technologies. It’s a simple, straightforward article, but one with lots of opportunities for enrichment. The reporter could include a graph showing low-carbon rollout statistics by industry, or embed an interview they recently did with a bio-technologist. They could link back to earlier modeling projects or cross-link to an opinion piece on decarbonization strategies.

But the journalist can only do that if they can find old content in their archives.

Underpowered search harms organizations in three ways.

First, employees lose time. If an old piece of content is necessary to a new story, there’s no getting around endless scrolling and searching, page after page, search term after search term. Often people will resort to using the site search operator query (site:example.com “search term”) on Google. Remember that these are highly-skilled, creative professionals we’re talking about — journalists, filmmakers, editors, and others. Do organizations really want to pay them to spend time on mundane information-gathering tasks? Almost certainly not.

The second consequence is productivity loss. While employees lose time searching, the knock-on effects go wider. Slogging through endless pages of search results is frustrating and energy-sapping. It leaves people feeling disengaged and uninspired. In the brutally competitive world of media, that is the last thing you want.

Lastly, companies lose the opportunity for impact. Media companies are like icebergs: you see only a fraction of their mass. The Washington Post publishes 1,200 stories a day but its archive runs to tens of millions of items. Faced with an undercooked search function, a lot of people will walk away, abandoning the opportunity for reuse, enrichment, and addition. Think again about the journalist who gives up looking for the perfect graph. This represents a colossal waste. It means media companies are leaving their archive to languish, ineffective, unused, and unprofitable.

But search doesn’t have to be a blocker.

In fact, modern search services can unleash media libraries and archives, putting information and content at your fingertips.

Your technology stack. Better search technology.

The future of search and discovery isn’t in improving the CMS’s native search. It’s impossible to build an off-the-shelf platform that fits everyone’s needs — let alone one with a powerful search function. Instead, leading media companies like The Times and POLITICO are turning to search microservices like Algolia.

Think of microservices as building blocks that can attach to your existing technologies. They augment narrow functions in your CMS, rather than replace it wholesale. It means you can revolutionize your internal search (and likely your user-facing search, too) without disrupting your editorial workflow.

Consider POLITICO Europe. Back in 2010, they launched POLITICO Pro, which aggregates journalism, data, and tools to deliver real-time intelligence and analysis to policy professionals. Publishing 500 daily articles, the platform faced the same challenge most media companies do: How do you manage such a huge content library in such a way to make it accessible?

To cut a long story short, they deployed a modern search microservice for their customers. It integrated with their existing tech stack, uniting their media libraries and allowing users to query multiple content indices at once. Overnight, paid users gained a way to intuitively and effectively search through ”24 million votes, 700,000 amendments, 16,000 legislators, and 7 million searchable items.” But here’s the interesting thing: it wasn’t just POLITICO Pro’s paid users who started using the service.

POLITICO Europe’s staff journalists began tapping into the new search function to make sense of the platform’s immense archive. Suddenly they could surface long-lost insights and once-hidden data points. It helped them do their job better and faster.

This is the future of search. Similar to what we described in our article on back-office search, it’s creating a Google-esque experience — only better. Third-party search engines own, control, and hide the search algorithm. You are at the mercy of their whims and experiments. On the other hand, search services reveal the inner workings of the machine and hand control to you. If you want to prioritize recency, you can. If you want to promote content from certain sources, you can. If you want to rank pieces by popularity, you can. You control the search experience.

Empower human-led creation

Media sits at the crossroads of human-led and machine-led creation. While algorithms and automated recommendations have revolutionized content publication, there is still something magical about having a human take control. Media companies need to double down on that magic by empowering their employees to search their media libraries and surface valuable content. We already have the technology to do so. All it requires is leadership to take the plunge.

Learn more about search in the media industry.

About the author
Pauline Lafontaine

Sr. Product Marketing Manager

linkedin

Recommended Articles

Powered byAlgolia Algolia Recommend

The (almost) ultimate guide to site search
product

Ivana Ivanovic

Senior Content Strategist

How to optimize your streaming service’s Media Discovery to help viewers find appealing titles
e-commerce

Tanya Herman

Product Manager

Search personalization 101: how to capitalize on personalized search and discovery
ux

Catherine Dee

Search and Discovery writer