Compare the tactical differences between Algolia and Elasticsearch to see which approach is best for meeting your needs.
While both companies are industry leaders in search, they offer dramatically different playbooks. One key difference is that Algolia is a Cloud-native, purpose-built, managed service that increases developer productivity 5x vs. Elastic’s software that can be hosted in the Cloud.
Cloud native: scalable, agile, and easy to roll out
Simplifies every step of the search development process, including indexing, relevance tuning, building user interfaces, and analyzing search trends
Designed specifically to create great consumer experiences
Powerful software built primarily for power users focused on log and end-point search use cases
Requires more back-end search expertise and development time to handle speed, scalability, and global needs
Very flexible, but more parts of the search stack must be coded by developers
How you build your data architecture impacts how quickly users can search through it to find content. Companies need to keep the user experience at the forefront, and that means creating a simple, accessible infrastructure for current and future success.
Worry free, low maintenance, and delivers performance to scale
Better organizes large data volumes (for example, product SKUs)
Easy configurability helps teams fine-tune for a better search experience
More complex approach to index management
Requires advanced planning, expertise, and optimization
Clients must already know their search needs and how they’ll evolve
Align search results with user behavior and business objectives. Search results need to accurately reflect what users are seeking; Digital, web and IT teams need the ability to adjust their tools, which enables greater customization - to achieve optimal user and business outcomes.
Built on transparent search rules that are simple and easy to manage
Utilizes business insights to improve accuracy of search results order
Integrates with AI to help engineers fine-tune search performance
Algorithms are more complex, unpredictable, and harder to control
Optimizing one set of search results may hurt others, potentially cutting into revenue
It’s hard to see where changes make the biggest impact
Building out search tools comes down to one goal: create search with customers in mind. Teams that prioritize their own convenience over the user experience will feel it in the pocketbook.
Comes prebuilt with 6 rich UI libraries
Fully customizable and features built-in security
Delivers a consumer-grade search experience
Offers only one basic UI library
Requires investment in an additional layer of security
Limited UX features limit analytical insights and opportunity for optimization
Providing curated results to deliver more individualized experiences is critical for engagement. Customers expect access to relevant content faster than ever, and that means using the right tools to proactively filter out what they’re not looking for.
Leverages AI to create a more personalized user experience
Built-in integrations with Relevance and Analytics
Instantly implements changes up to 100x faster than alternatives
Build-it-yourself model requires extensive coding
Implementation is always reliant on development team speed and search expertise
May take weeks for developers to build sophisticated tools
Collecting mountains of data doesn’t help if you don’t have a plan for how to analyze, visualize and optimize based on the usage patterns. Take the essential step to maximize search efficacy based on user behavior metrics.
Bolsters search experience with preloaded user and performance insights
Leverages KPIs to optimize search and discovery
Surfaces opportunities to improve the search experience
Requires data engineering to extract information and build visualizations
Success predicated on do-it-yourself reporting tools
No business insights provided; additional tools needed
While both companies are industry leaders in search, they offer dramatically different playbooks. One key difference is that Algolia is a Cloud-native, purpose-built, managed service that increases developer productivity 5x vs. Elastic’s software that can be hosted in the Cloud.
Cloud native: scalable, agile, and easy to roll out
Simplifies every step of the search development process, including indexing, relevance tuning, building user interfaces, and analyzing search trends
Designed specifically to create great consumer experiences
Powerful software built primarily for power users focused on log and end-point search use cases
Requires more back-end search expertise and development time to handle speed, scalability, and global needs
Very flexible, but more parts of the search stack must be coded by developers
Worry free, low maintenance, and delivers performance to scale
Better organizes large data volumes (for example, product SKUs)
Easy configurability helps teams fine-tune for a better search experience
More complex approach to index management
Requires advanced planning, expertise, and optimization
Clients must already know their search needs and how they’ll evolve
Built on transparent search rules that are simple and easy to manage
Utilizes business insights to improve accuracy of search results order
Integrates with AI to help engineers fine-tune search performance
Algorithms are more complex, unpredictable, and harder to control
Optimizing one set of search results may hurt others, potentially cutting into revenue
It’s hard to see where changes make the biggest impact
Comes prebuilt with 6 rich UI libraries
Fully customizable and features built-in security
Delivers a consumer-grade search experience
Offers only one basic UI library
Requires investment in an additional layer of security
Limited UX features limit analytical insights and opportunity for optimization
Leverages AI to create a more personalized user experience
Built-in integrations with Relevance and Analytics
Instantly implements changes up to 100x faster than alternatives
Build-it-yourself model requires extensive coding
Implementation is always reliant on development team speed and search expertise
May take weeks for developers to build sophisticated tools
Bolsters search experience with preloaded user and performance insights
Leverages KPIs to optimize search and discovery
Surfaces opportunities to improve the search experience
Requires data engineering to extract information and build visualizations
Success predicated on do-it-yourself reporting tools
No business insights provided; additional tools needed
According to its 2017 State of the Octoverse report, Github now hosts more than 25 million active public repositories. Many of these projects are tools made by developers for developers, and being...
Read more
This report provides a 10-step guide to choosing an ecommerce platform and the state of the ecommerce platform world in 2022.
Read more
If you’re looking at this page right now, you already know the importance of equipping your site with a great search and discovery experience. And if you’re considering an open source option like...
Read more