How to increase your ecommerce conversion rate in 2024
2%. That’s the average conversion rate for an online store. Unless you’re performing at Amazon’s promoted products ...
Senior Digital Marketing Manager, SEO
2%. That’s the average conversion rate for an online store. Unless you’re performing at Amazon’s promoted products ...
Senior Digital Marketing Manager, SEO
What’s a vector database? And how different is it than a regular-old traditional relational database? If you’re ...
Search and Discovery writer
How do you measure the success of a new feature? How do you test the impact? There are different ways ...
Senior Software Engineer
Algolia's advanced search capabilities pair seamlessly with iOS or Android Apps when using FlutterFlow. App development and search design ...
Sr. Developer Relations Engineer
In the midst of the Black Friday shopping frenzy, Algolia soared to new heights, setting new records and delivering an ...
Chief Executive Officer and Board Member at Algolia
When was your last online shopping trip, and how did it go? For consumers, it’s becoming arguably tougher to ...
Senior Digital Marketing Manager, SEO
Have you put your blood, sweat, and tears into perfecting your online store, only to see your conversion rates stuck ...
Senior Digital Marketing Manager, SEO
“Hello, how can I help you today?” This has to be the most tired, but nevertheless tried-and-true ...
Search and Discovery writer
We are proud to announce that Algolia was named a leader in the IDC Marketscape in the Worldwide General-Purpose ...
VP Corporate Marketing
Twice a year, B2B Online brings together America’s leading manufacturers and distributors to uncover learnings and industry trends. This ...
Director, Sales Enablement & B2B Practice Leader
Generative AI and large language models (LLMs). These two cutting-edge AI technologies sound like totally different, incomparable things. One ...
Search and Discovery writer
ChatGPT, Bing, Bard, YouChat, DALL-E, Jasper…chances are good you’re leveraging some version of generative artificial intelligence on ...
Search and Discovery writer
Your users are spoiled. They’re used to Google’s refined and convenient search interface, so they have high expectations ...
Technical Writer
Imagine if, as your final exam for a computer science class, you had to create a real-world large language ...
Sr. SEO Web Digital Marketing Manager
What do you think of the OpenAI ChatGPT app and AI language models? There’s lots going on: GPT-3 ...
Search and Discovery writer
In the fast-paced and dynamic realm of digital merchandising, being reactive to customer trends has been the norm. In ...
Staff User Researcher
You’re at a dinner party when the conversation takes a computer-science-y turn. Have you tried ChatGPT? What ...
Sr. SEO Web Digital Marketing Manager
It’s the era of Big Data, and super-sized language models are the latest stars. When it comes to ...
Search and Discovery writer
Imagine you are the CTO of a company that has just undergone a massive decade long digital transformation. You’ve built out a team of 100+ software engineers that are really starting to deliver substantial revenue growth and cost savings to the business.
Each time you’ve faced a buy vs build decision your team of talented engineers has told you: “hold my beer, we’ve got this.” They argue “why spend hundreds of thousands on a SaaS vendor when our team can roll out an open source alternative on AWS and run it ourselves?” And it has typically worked, saving the company money that can be reinvested back into hiring more engineers.
It was hard enough to do the total cost of ownership (TCO) calculus for traditional SaaS software: How much are we spending on AWS now and how come we need so many engineers just to keep the lights on? Is this really saving us money?
But now, AI is changing everything. Your engineering teams now want to start hiring data scientists and building AI capabilities. And you’re faced with more buy vs build decisions.The same SaaS vendors you thought you could out-build for less cost now have powerful new AI features and functionality.
The good news is the buy vs build decision is more straightforward in the world of AI.
Hiring a team of talented data scientists is really hard. The race for AI talent has driven up the overall costs of hiring and retaining staff, particularly from top university PhD programs. Are your company’s pockets as deep as big tech, and can your company’s brand compete with the Google’s and OpenAI’s of the world?
There is a risk you might end up with a below average data science team if you can’t win the war for talent.
It takes a long time to build a team from scratch, with hiring lead times at 6mo+. It takes data scientists an especially long time to onboard, as the complexities of the work and data require experimentation to gain experience.
It takes even longer to mature a new capability like data science inside your organization: building tools, processes and capabilities that never existed before. You should expect 2 years or longer from the decision to hire to having the first products live. Can your company wait that long?
To succeed in building AI, you need to have a culture that embraces scientific experimentation. Learning in production is the only way to build and optimize models. This culture is very different from building software, where the solution (and delivery timelines) can often be explained in great detail before a line of code is written.
AI, on the other hand, means failing (repeatedly) in production and not knowing if the next experiment is going to work or not. Many companies simply can’t develop and nurture this culture.
You need a lot of data to train AI models from scratch. It is quite likely you don’t have as much data as a vendor who is able to leverage the data from thousands of customers to create a model that performs significantly better than yours.
Without scale in data it takes a long time to test our new experiments and your algorithms will improve slowly. Data is the lifeblood of an AI team and most companies simply don’t have the scale to compete.
The AI industry is moving extremely fast. If you choose to build your own capabilities, you’ll only be able to adapt as fast as your team. Can they keep up with the latest research papers, attend the conferences and keep on the bleeding edge of what’s possible?
By making the choice to buy rather than building, you can adapt through vendor selection and piggy back on your vendors’ AI teams’ knowledge of the cutting edge.
Running AI systems in production is extremely challenging. They require high speed, real time pipelines of data and large amounts of compute resources. When demand spikes are you able to scale up quickly and then ramp down before the costs pile up? Do you have specialist reliability engineers that know how to run and quality control AI models?
Vendors can aggregate demand from a range of customers and spread the load with spikes happening at different times. Vendors can afford to hire specialist reliability engineers to run AI systems at scale.
Even Microsoft — a company with the resources and talent to build AI — chose to buy part of their AI solution for Bing.
The reasons for buying instead of building an AI solution check the same boxes as gaining the competitive advantage. You can match the talent and speed of the biggest names in tech while gaining the insights and system reliability that enable your organization to sustain the pace of business in the age of AI.
Catch and keep up with the state of AI search with these rundowns from the AI search experts at Algolia.
Reach out to our team so we can discuss the benefits of buying over building AI together.
CTO @Algolia
Powered by Algolia Recommend